Resident evil 4 remake dusk golem5/30/2023 ![]() ![]() We strongly recommend you stop using this browser until this problem is corrected. The latest version of the Opera browser sends multiple invalid requests to our servers for every page you visit.The most common causes of this issue are: They will not go back to remake RE1 in the newest RE game engine, and this same thought process of mine applies to why they wouldn't go back to RE2 and RE3 to remaster the originals in the vein of RE HD Remaster.Your IP address has been temporarily blocked due to a large number of HTTP requests. RE1 had its original and remaster, and then HD version. I would love to see such HD remasters happen for 98 RE2 and 99 RE3 in the vein of RE HD Remaster but I know it will never happen because it isn't as profitable of a game in comparison to modernized remakes. But there just isn't any way they are going to make 3+ versions of a specific title that could be considered true remasters or remakes. imagine 1998 RE2 + 1999 RE3 being remastered in the vein of how RE1 got remastered, which updated visuals, added content, gave some good quality of life improvements to game play mechanics, etc) instead of going straight to remakes for RE2 and RE3. If they were to do both a remaster and remake of RE1 then why would they do JUST remakes for RE2 and RE3? (ie. Also if that was their line of thinking then they would have remastered RE2 and RE3 too. I was using some hypothetical situation to say that just isn't on the table for Capcom in my opinion. That is a lot of rehashing that I don't think any company would be willing to entertain. I was commenting towards that idea.which if that happened would mean RE1 not only got remastered for originally the Gamecube, then a HD version of the remaster for PC, and then a full on remake like 2019 RE RE3. It makes financial sense to do RE4 over CV, but for fans of the series, not fans of a single game, it is an insult and disservice to us all to think we wanted RE4 over CV ![]() They are going after the cash cow known as RE4. If that was the case of how they wanted to go back to older titles then they should also be doing HD remasters of the original RE2 and RE3.which I would seriously love but c'mon we know that will not ever happen. RE1 and RE0 got HD remasters, they do not need to be remade. However, I do plan on purchasing it at next future sale and be open minded about the first person view because I am guessing this is the format going to be used for 8 at least if not all future RE titles. I haven't played through RE7 yet but I got the demo for it and was turned off by the first person perspective and never went back. Called Resident Evil Village with an interesting way of highlighting of the "Vill" in village to spell out VIII or roman numerals for 8.similar cheesy concept they did for RE7 with using the "vil" in evil to spell out VII for 7. Also for those who are thinking RE8 should be next they also have a leak about that. RE4 isn't even in need of a remake since it's gameplay mechanics are already relatively close to the modern remakes of RE2 and RE3. I would think that Code Veronica was the next logical step in the remake sequence! It is what the majority of fans are asking for if you check out other related threads over the last couple years. The gameplay was completely different and I just am not a fan of the game I guess. Though I really enjoy the ability to use the "modern" controls for example in the HD remasters of RE1 and RE0. I was rubbed the wrong way coming from a longtime fan of the fixed camera angles, pre rendered backgrounds, tank controls. I am apparently the only person on planet earth who doesn't sing praise for RE4. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |